‘Reframing NREGA a criminal neglect’
Abdul Hafees
27/10/2014
New Delhi: Seminar held at Jawaharlal Nehru
University in New Delhi strongly condemned the attempts made by the Modi-government
to reframe the National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA). The new
decision would only reduce its benefits and render people workless, said Nikhil
De, social activist based in Delhi.
“The people who are below the
poverty line who hardly get jobs in its primary stage receive only a minimum
wage with no increment thereafter,” says De. “However, those, above the line
lacking the basic livelihood means living in rural areas also feel they are
neglected from the employment scheme whereas the government is not concerned
about their situations as well,” he accused.
The NREGA employment scheme
was passed in 2005 when the first UPA government was in power. The well-appreciated
employment scheme, aimed at boosting “the livelihood security by providing at
least one hundred days of guaranteed wage employment in a financial year to
every rural house,” have further received much criticism for various forms of
corruptions in a couple of states so far.
Nithin Ghadkari, Minister
for Rural Development, had announced before that the government would consider
revising the NREGA by limiting the number of its beneficiary villages from 645
to 200, and saving the required revenue for the machinery in terms of the work
that has been done by employees, to stop the exploitation in this scheme’
“Minimising its
beneficiaries is not the way to end corruption. It is a criminal neglect
towards the work rights of the poor and destitute people, De added. The
government should streamline the programme taking cognizant of the basic living
means of the backward people living in remote areas,” De argued. “And the
proceedings should be frequently verified in order to make it scam-free and
ensure its expected outcome in different states of the country,” he added.
De also asked why some senior journalists are
in a hurry to jot down the impact of this scheme to a great extent, while at
the same time they ignore the ample irregularities piled upon it.
No comments:
Post a Comment